Writers had been asked to submit their documents up to a database that is new PubMed Central within 6 months of book. The journals, perhaps not the writers, would retain copyright. As well as the biggest compromise: Participation was voluntary. The hope, Eisen says, had been that the “good dudes” (the systematic communities) would perform some right thing, additionally the “bad dudes” (the commercial publishers) would look bad and finally cave in.
It had been wishful reasoning. A lot of the communities refused to participate—even following the proprietary period had been extended to per year. “I nevertheless feel quite miffed,” says Varmus, whom now operates the nationwide Cancer Institute, “that these societies that are scientific that ought to be acting like guilds in order to make our enterprise more powerful, have now been terribly resistant to improvements into the publishing industry.”
In September 2000, sick and tired with the recalcitrance for the writers, Eisen, Brown, and Varmus staged a boycott. In a available letter, they pledged which they would not any longer publish in, donate to, or peer-review for just about any journal that declined to be a part of PubMed Central. Almost 34,000 researchers from 180 countries signed on—but this, too, had been a breasts. “The writers knew that they had the experts throughout the barrel,” Eisen says. “They called our bluff. This all took place right that I was being insane as I got hired at Berkeley, and I was very clearly advised by my colleagues. I might never get tenure if i did son’t toe a far more traditional publishing line.”